| < Previous | Next > | Table of Contents | Peter Jensen Home page |
|---|
18. The maze of time
“In this strange labyrinth how shall I turn?”
* * *
“Yet that which most my troubled
sense doth move
Is to leave all, and take the thread of love.”
lines 1
& 13—14,
# 77, from the Crown of Sonnets, Urania
Mary Wroth (1621)
For
a moment, let's take the image of time as a labyrinth seriously. Is it possible
that Shakespeare designed the Sonnets
like a maze? In his time, both village-green, turf "labyrinths" and
private estate, hedge "labyrinths" were popular. But Robert Field differentiates labyrinths
from mazes:
...
the word 'labyrinth' should only be
applied to two designs ...the 'Classical Labyrinth' and the 'Medieval Christian
Labyrinth'.... A labyrinth ... [has] only one pathway to the middle and ... no
choices are offered. Such designs are called ... 'unicursive'.... The word 'maze'
is used where at various points you are given a choice of pathways. In such
designs, it is possible to get lost.... Such designs are called ... 'multicursive.' (3)
So the Minotaur of Crete was kept in a maze, not a labyrinth. What does it
feel like inside the Sonnets? Well,
there is one path to follow. That path has straight parts as in the first
seventeen sonnets, but at Sonnet 18, the reader takes a turn. Sonnets 18 and 19
are a pair. Then we take another turn: Sonnets 20 and 21 form a pair, and so
on. Many have tried to read the Sonnets
in a linear way, as a
"unicursive labyrinth." The other way to read them is to notice all
the choices Shakespeare builds for exploration of themes. When you read the Sonnets thematically or look at separated
sonnets as pairs, the overall design
feels more like a "multicursive maze" in a tall hedge, where you can
make wrong turns and where you can't see the center.
Sir Thomas Wyatt, one of Shakespeare’s favorite poets,
used the maze as “an image of the lover’s confusion” (Schmidgall 91). Wyatt
writes of his “long error in a blind maze chained” (Qtd in Schmidgall 91). In a
ballade, Wyatt exclaims, “Alas, I tread an endless maze” (91). Wyatt and other
Renaissance writers also used the maze as an image for the court (175). In
Sonnet #58, Shakespeare calls himself his patron’s love “slave,” and like an
angry suitor, he shows, in lines 13 and 14, his frustration at being stuck
waiting for the young lord to get around to seeing him:
“I am to wait, though waiting be so hell,
Not to blame your pleasure be it ill or
well.”
Gary Schmidgall quite
rightly points out that in the poet/patron relationship, there can never be
“equality.” He points out that
Time weighs heavily in the Young Man sonnets.
It is no
coincidence that the word time occurs about seventy times in them
and not once in the Dark Lady sonnets. (Schmidgall
174)
So, being stuck in the maze of the sonnets is supposed to feel frustrating. The music is complex, like sweet melody and dissonant counterpoint. But every musical composition or maze has a design. If only the reader could get a bird's eye view, the overall design might be seen. If only I were smarter or could fly higher like Shakespeare’s lark! But I cannot see all of his design. I enter 126 solar sonnets first, and then I enter 28 lunar sonnets. I feel the earlier introduction of the dark lady’s affair with the youth as an inserted triangle, Sonnets 34—61, an aside I can get lost in. I had heard early rumors of the youth’s lack of good faith.
I
feel Shakespeare’s despair twice (at the
same time): once in Sonnet #40 for betrayal by the youth and again in
Sonnet #133 for betrayal by the lady. In Sonnet #40, Will cries, “Take all my
loves, my love, yea take them all” (line 1), and in Sonnet #133, he cries, “Of
him, myself, and thee, I am forsaken,/ A torment thrice threefold thus to be
crossed” (lines 7 & 8). So he doesn’t feel twice the pain. He feels three
times three or nine times the pain.
And he doesn’t feel double-crossed; he feels triple-crossed, forsaken even by himself. Each of the three
relationships—to the youth, the lady, and himself—is multiplied by three. We
experience a complex, kaleidoscopic vision when we take on his point of view. A
triangle of internal mirrors bounces each image nine ways. This may make clear
seeing in the maze impossible or very difficult.
In
the first solar series, Shakespeare finally gets free of the youth’s betrayal
and into clear air again. In the dark lady series, he does not. The end of the
sequence is not an exit from the maze.
As we finish Sonnet # 154, we feel incomplete. Time bends back from the
end of the lunar month to just before the middle of the solar summer. Time really
runs on from Sonnet 154 back to #62 and then on until Sonnet 126. So the end of
time happens before the end of the sequence. Time is a huge serpent with a loop
and a double back and a tail.
I
feel the Rival Poet series as another inserted triangle. I get lost at first
because there is more than one rival. But the series finally narrows down to
one main, more dangerous rival. And the series ends in the past tense as if the
rival were dead and only his last written work was the ghost of a threat in a
dark hallway. I am trying to “envision” Shakespeare’s design. Do the two
triangles of the youth and the lady intersect in the maze like a Solomon’s
Seal? Or do the two triangles of lady and rival share one straight line from
Will to Henry and form a diamond out to the two points? The geometry of this
maze includes straight lines, turns, pairs, opposites, parallel corridors,
three interior triangles, an end that is not an exit, and an exit that is not
an end. I am still trying to develop more ideas about the internal parts of
this maze. But typical of any maze, the design does not reveal itself while you
are strolling or lost inside it. Only a bird’s eye view would help us draw a
chart. (For my attempted bird’s eye view
and map, see Figure 2.)
The
problem of trying to represent the Sonnets
with a garden maze is that this maze of time is also taking place in the sky.
This sequence is a sophisticated maze of time. It is a 126-day summer with 28
nights represented in tandem with 28 days in May and June. We can read the
sequence in a linear fashion; that lets us read about the solar youth and then
read about the lunar lady, but that is also very confusing. And that is part of
the confusion built in and generated by any maze. If we don’t coordinate days
with nights, we get lost. If we don’t keep track of time, we get lost. If we
make wrong turns, we get lost.
I
believe that the only real Ariadne’s thread Shakespeare provides is the thread
of time we can follow under the sun and the moon. Let's look up and fit the
smaller Lunar cycle inside the large Solar series. Let’s pretend we can see the
Moon and the Sun racing across the days and nights for 28 days. The lady's
lunar cycle may be named with a silly rhyme: "June Moon." I believe
we can match all of the 28 sonnets about her or under her influence with the
phases of the Moon. In this astronomy, Henry is the Sun, Aemilia is the Moon,
and Will is the Earth (or later, the Globe). If we do not look up at the sky to
follow the Sun/days and Moon/nights, we will get seriously lost, and then
“Devouring Time,” like that fabled monster, the Minotaur, will eat us, like the
annual sacrificial boy and girl virgins from
As
in any encoded document, the names, the words, the letters, the dates, and the
numbers all have to work together and be decoded together for us to get the
full meaning of the message. Perhaps it is the code that provides the thread of
Ariadne that keeps us oriented inside the maze. It is so easy to get lost in
the Sonnets! Perhaps it is the
code—in all its forms and even incomplete as my findings are—that gives us the
string of clues to keep us on track. As readers we walk, picking up on puns as
echoes, bits of logic, hints of autobiographical meaning, snippets of word
music, and cycles of numbers.
For
example, we know that the first sonnet about music is numbered 8 because the
scale is an octave. In it, we hear the tonic chord based on the 1st,
3rd, and 5th pitches as a sound “picture” of a happy
husband, wife, and child. Later, we find a connection and clue in the only
other sonnet about music #128. It, too, has an 8 in its number, and the dark
lady is playing the virginal. 128 = 12 + 8, and twelve is a time number, half a
day. This may refer to the night, and 128 = 100 + 28. Twenty-eight is a Moon
number. As one of my students, who is a music major reminded me, there are also
twelve keys in every octave. By such clues, we find our way in this maze and
wonder where we are. Sometimes I feel a bit like the clown or the butler
following Ariel’s music.
Overhead,
there are the Sun and the Moon. It helps we can look up and see them in the sky
over the maze. The solar and lunar cycles seem to interlock something like
Table 9 in our Gregorian calendar (below). Here is a list of solar sonnets in
blue, June dates in red, other dates in blue, and lunar sonnets in red to fit
with days and nights and the phases of the Moon:
Table 9: Solar
and Lunar Sonnets: Our Gregorian Calendar
SOLAR Sonnet # LUNAR Sonnet # Subject Phase
MONTHS Sun MONTH Moon of
Cycle & DATES Cycle MOON
MAY Son.
1 May 1 Sun Begins Summer
JUNE Son. 34 June
3 Son. 127 Dark Lady Dark/New
JUNE Son. 35 June
4 Son. 128 Virginal Waxing
Cres.
JUNE Son. 40 June
9 Son. 133 Triangle Quarter
JUNE Son. 48 June
17 Son. 141 Heart as fool FULL
SOLSTICE Son. 52 June
21 Son. 145 And Hate-away Waning Gib.
JUNE Son. 58 June 27 Son. 151 Name spelled Waning Cres.
JUNE Son. 61 June
30 Son. 154 Cupid's Brand Thin Bow/
Old Moon
JULY Son.
63 July 2 Sun is 1/2 way to 126
AUGUST Son.
93 Aug. 1 Eve's apple grows
AUGUST Son.
116 Aug. 24 North Star
SEPT. Son.
126 Sept. 3 Sun Ends Summer
(Later, we will have to
worry about conversion to Shakespeare’s Julian calendar that adjusts Sonnet 1
to April 24th and Summer Solstice Sonnets 52 and 145 to June 14th
and Sonnet 126 to August 27th. I have also designed a maze diagram
that fits this Table. See Figure 3, next page.)
Shakespeare is not the only poet of his time to set up a
calendar in his sonnets. Kenneth J. Larsen discovered a calendar in Spencer’s Amoretti.
The eighty-nine sonnets of the Amoretti, as numbered in the 1595
octavo edition, were written to correspond with
consecutive dates,
beginning on Wednesday 23 January 1594 and running,
with one
interval, through to Friday 17 May 1594: they
correspond with the
daily and sequential order of scriptural readings
that are
prescribed for those dates by the liturgical
calendar of the Church of
England. (Qtd in Weatherby 127)
Larsen’s thesis is based
on “Dunlap’s remarkable discovery (in
1969—70) … Dunlap claimed liturgical status only for sonnets 22 through 68,
which appear to correspond to the days of Lent in 1594” (127). A brief
summation of Dunlap’s claims would look like this:
Table 10.
Calendar Days and Spencer’s Sonnets
Sonnet
22 “penitential” Ash Wednesday
Sonnet 62 March
25, 1594 New Year’s Day,
Feast of the Annunciation
(Data from Dunlap, Qtd in Weatherby)
So, in 1595, Shakespeare may
have been inspired by the Christian poet Spencer
to design his sonnet
sequence with a different kind of built-in, secular calendar.
| < Previous | Next > | Table of Contents | Peter Jensen Home page |
|---|